blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘hunger’

Partner Series: Women Thrive Travels to Burkina Faso

Thursday, July 1st, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Women ThriveIn our next blog post looking at the work of MFAN’s Partners, we will highlight the work of Women Thrive Worldwide, a non-profit organization seeking to shape U.S. policy in order to foster economic opportunities for women in developing countries. Women Thrive believes that women are the key to ending global poverty, and investing in women and girls is one of the most efficient uses of U.S. foreign aid. Research has proven that women are more likely than men to invest any income they receive in food, clean water, education and health care for their children, creating a positive cycle that can lift entire communities out of poverty. And now more than ever world attention has turned toward empowering women through a variety of initiatives, including the Obama administration’s Global Health Initiative, which makes women’s health interventions a top priority.

Last month, Ritu Sharma, President and Co-founder of Women Thrive and an MFAN Principal, traveled to Burkina Faso to learn more about the challenges that women farmers face in trying to feed their families. Many Burkinabe women spend their days performing difficult fieldwork to grow food and crops, all while caring for children.  Yet, because customary law excludes women from owning land, most are unable to invest in the tools and resources that would allow them to better feed their families. In her travel diary, Ritu explains why even Burkina’s newest land laws are designed to keep most benefits of land reform from reaching women farmers, what she calls “discrimination, plain and simple.”

Learn more about Ritu’s trip to Burkina Faso and read an excerpt from her travel diary after the jump:

(more…)

MFAN Statement: MFAN Congratulates Bread for the World and Rev. David Beckmann on 2010 World Food Prize

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

June 16, 2010 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chair George Ingram:

On behalf of my fellow MFAN Principals and the entire network, I offer my most sincere congratulations to our friend and colleague Rev. David Beckmann for winning the 2010 World Food Prize.  Throughout his career as President of Bread for the World and, more recently, as MFAN’s Co-Chair, David has been a tireless advocate for millions around the world suffering from extreme poverty and hunger.  His strong and compelling voice has also helped drive unprecedented progress on foreign assistance reform, which will directly benefit those poor and hungry worldwide.

After the announcement, David commented on foreign assistance reform in the context of the award:

“Right now, we have exceptional opportunities to win changes in Congress to provide help and opportunity to hungry people in our country and around the world.  For example, we have the best chance we have had in decades to reform U.S. foreign aid so that we’ll make the best possible use of tax dollars and get more of our aid to people who really need help.  Getting more serious about ending hunger in this country and around the world would be good for our nation and good for our souls.”

I believe David’s prize will help energize the entire reform movement as we push for President Obama to deliver America’s first-ever Global Development Strategy and work with Congress on new foreign assistance legislation that will make our development efforts more effective and accountable than ever before.

New Poll Shows Broad Support Among Americans for MDGs

Monday, May 10th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

MDG_WeCan_EndPoverty2015logo_unf

bwc_header-01

In new polling released last week by the United Nations Foundation and its sister organization the Better World Campaign (an MFAN partner), an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that the United States should be involved in a worldwide effort to address urgent issues related to global poverty as part of the Millennium Development Goals, as adopted by 189 nations in September 2000.  The survey indicates that Americans consider issues such as access to clean water, children’s health, extreme hunger, and access to education to be top priorities that nations mustaddress to combat global poverty.

“This new data confirms that Americans recognize that working together with our international partners through the UN is more effective than trying to solve the world’s challenges alone,” said Timothy E. Wirth, President of the United Nations Foundation. “Confronting an issue like global poverty requires a smart approach to global coordination and the UN is uniquely positioned to provide and deliver global coordination every single day.”

Key highlights of the research include:

  • Voters continue to be concerned about the personal impact of international issues and how international issues abroad will affect them here in the United States.
  • Although roughly nine out of ten Americans (89%) say they are not familiar with the specifics of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), after hearing a brief description of the eight goals, 87% of Americans believe the United States should be very (43%) or somewhat (44%) involved in a worldwide effort to accomplish the MDGs by 2015.
  • The majority of Americans believe seven of the eight MDGs should be an absolute top or high priority to accomplish by 2015.  When asked to choose which MDG is most important to accomplish, Americans chose those goals that address the most basic human needs for survival: access to safe drinking water (47%) and alleviating extreme hunger/poverty (36%).
  • There has been a positive shift in public perception of how the United States is viewed by other countries under President Obama’s Administration.  In September 2007, 78% of voters said the United States is “less respected by other countries;” today the percentage has dropped to 60%.
  • Two-thirds of Americans (67%) believe the United Nations is still needed today; majorities of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans agree with this assessment.

The research, undertaken by a bipartisan polling team led by Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies and Geoff Garin of Peter D. Hart Research Associates, is among the most extensive research on this subject during the Obama Administration and reflects the results of four focus groups in Virginia and the District of Columbia, and a national survey of 900 likely voters.  The poll was conducted from April 10-14th, 2010.  The margin of error on the sample of 900 is + 3.27%.

Read the executive summary here. View the complete polling data here.

MFAN Statement: Raj Shah Vision Speech at USGLC

Friday, May 7th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

4584253981_0154485cfb

MFAN Statement: Shah Speech Touches on Important Elements of Reform

May 6, 2010 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

MFAN congratulates U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Administrator Rajiv Shah for his visionary speech yesterday to supporters of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition.  In the speech, Administrator Shah strongly endorsed elevating development as a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy and empowering it as a distinct discipline that requires unique resources and authority.   Citing the fact that global hunger and extreme poverty have increased in recent years, Administrator Shah issued a call for reform of his Agency and America’s development apparatus overall, in order to drive more tangible results for recipients, implementers, and taxpayers.

He outlined a new agenda for USAID that mirrors this week’s leaked draft of the Presidential Study Directive on Global Development Policy (PSD-7):

  • Commit to honoring the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
  • Ensure country ownership and growth through trade, cost-effective and long-term investments, and diplomacy
  • Use science and technology to develop and deliver transformative tools and innovations
  • Insert development expertise into policy debates for conflict areas and frontline states

Administrator Shah also announced that USAID would reconstitute a policy planning bureau and as-yet-undefined budget vehicle, as well as drive procurement reforms and institute a new measurement and evaluation regime this year, which are all positive steps towards making U.S. foreign assistance more effective and accountable.

What was missing, however, was a stronger pledge to work with Congress to pass legislation supporting these much-needed reforms, particularly by rewriting the antiquated Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.  We urge Administrator Shah to work with House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman (D-CA), who is likely to  submit a rewritten bill this year.  We  also strongly encourage Administrator Shah to establish an open and consistent line of communication with Congressional leaders including Chairman Berman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA), Ranking Minority Member Senator Dick Lugar (R-IN), among others.

In implementing PSD-7, the Administration also must ensure the Administrator Shah is fully empowered to lead U.S. developments.  We look forward to working with the Obama Administration to reach this goal.

Lew, Shah Outline Obama Administration’s Food Security Plans

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Jack LewRaj ShahIn a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing last week, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Jack Lew and USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah provided an update on the status of the Administration’s Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative (GHFSI).

Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) opened the hearing by calling food insecurity “a challenge to our broader development efforts” as well as a challenge to our national security.  He also referenced the proposed $4 billion cut in international affairs spending in the budget resolution passed out of the Senate Budget Committee, saying, “Even in a tough budget environment, short-changing programs like these, in our judgment, will deliver little budget relief at enormous negative consequence to our global efforts… And it seems to me that it is wrong, and we will fight against any efforts to reduce the president’s request for a small increase, which is essential to the transformation of our foreign policy efforts and frankly to the recalibration of the allocation of resources between defense and diplomacy and humanitarian efforts.”

(more…)