blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘climate change’

Sec. Clinton Goes to Bat for FY2011 International Affairs Budget

Monday, March 1st, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Reuters-Secretary Clinton testifies before Congress

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a forceful case to Congress last week on the importance of President Obama’s recently submitted request for the fiscal 2011 International Affairs Budget.  In four separate hearings – on back-to-back days – before House and Senate authorizers and appropriators, Clinton discussed the budget request for U.S. foreign affairs spending and explicitly linked it to our national security and national interests.

Of the $4.9 billion increase from FY2010, $3.6 billion would go to what the State Department calls “frontline states”—Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.  The remainder represents a mere 2.7% increase that Clinton said would “address global challenges, strengthen partnerships, and ensure that the State Department and USAID are equipped with the right people and resources.”

She acknowledged current economic constraints, citing her former role as U.S. Senator and the valid concerns of constituents across the country: “For every dollar we spend, we have to show results.” But she went on to affirm that the budget request supports programs that are “vital to our national security, our national interests, and our leadership in the world, while guarding against waste, duplication, and irrelevancy.”

In elevating the role of development within U.S. foreign policy, Clinton said the budget “makes targeted investments in fragile societies which, in our interconnected world, bear heavily on our own security and prosperity.”  She also argued for paying it forward, that a little bit now will go a long way: “These investments are a key part of our effort to get ahead of crises rather than just responding to them, positioning us to deal with the threats and challenges that lie before us.”  To bring this point home, she emphasized: “We can bury our heads in the sand and pay the consequences later, or we can make hard-nosed, targeted investments now, addressing the security challenges of today while building a stronger foundation for security and prosperity in the future.”

She highlighted the Administration’s global food security and health initiatives, along with climate change, as the major components of the budget’s investments in development.  A cross-cutting focus of these initiatives is women and girls “who are the key drivers of economic and social progress in the developing world.”

There will also be money for an additional 410 Foreign Service Officers at the State Department and 200 at USAID in an ongoing effort to ramp up civilian capacity.

“These initiatives are designed to enhance American security, help people in need, and give the American people a strong return on their investment,” Clinton concluded.  “Our aim is not to create dependency, but to help people develop solutions that they can sustain for themselves over the long term.”

MFAN Statement: USAID Nominee Shah’s Leadership Needed on Development

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

091110_rjs_portraitNovember 10, 2009 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

We applaud the nomination of Dr. Rajiv Shah to be Administrator for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).  We are hopeful that his unique combination of knowledge about global health, agriculture, and other issues will allow him to provide a strong and indispensable development voice as major decisions are made about U.S. foreign policy.  Congress should confirm Dr. Shah quickly.

If confirmed, Dr. Shah will take leadership of America’s premier development agency at a time when we face complex challenges in the developing world, not just from conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also from transnational threats such as disease, poverty and lack of opportunity, hunger, climate change, and political instability.  This is why the Obama Administration has pledged to elevate development as a core pillar of U.S. foreign policy alongside defense and diplomacy, and is already undertaking a whole-of-government review of how the U.S. engages with poor countries.  If confirmed, Dr. Shah will be the U.S. government’s lead voice on these urgent issues; therefore, the Obama Administration should take the following steps to empower him during these challenging times by:

  • Giving him a seat at the National Security Council from which he can bring a high-level and distinct development voice to critical foreign policy discussions, including the White House’s ongoing Presidential Study Directive on Global Development Policy;
  • Installing him as a co-chair of the State Department’s Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR); and
  • Revitalizing the agency he will lead by restoring USAID’s policy planning and budget capabilities, as well as the technical development capacity and expertise of the agency (as provided for in the bipartisan Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act of 2009, S.1524, which the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will consider soon).

We look forward to supporting Dr. Shah and the Obama Administration in their efforts to strengthen development and make foreign assistance more effective and accountable for the 21st century.

CONTACT: Sam Hiersteiner at 202-295-0171 or shiersteiner@gpgdc.com.

WWF US CEO Takes Reform Message to Capitol Hill

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

WWFImgFullitem11818

As we noted yesterday, WWF US President and CEO Carter Roberts, one of the world’s leading conservationists, has a unique view on foreign assistance reform.  Today, he brought his message to Capitol Hill for a bi-cameral hearing on the innovative Congo Basin Forest Partnership (CBFP), hosted by Rep. Ed Royce (D-CA), chair of the International Conservation Caucus.  In his testimony at the hearing, Roberts drew important links between conservation and foreign assistance reform:

“More work should also be done, for the benefit of the Congo Basin and other developing countries, by the U.S. government to modernize its foreign assistance.  We are in need of an overarching development strategy that recognizes the critical importance of securing the underlying natural resource base. We need a USAID Administrator and a strengthened development agency to carry out programs like the model CBFP in other regions and scale up efforts to meet pressing natural resource challenges. And we need to help build the capacity of civil society and governments within these regions so that host countries will own these programs and assure their sustainability into the future.”

For more information on the hearing, click here.

For more information on WWF’s foreign assistance reform work, click here.

Leading Conservationist Weighs in on Foreign Assistance Reform – Part 1 of 2

Monday, September 28th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

Carter RobertsWWF logo

As the only conservation leader among MFAN’s Principals, World Wildlife Fund US CEO Carter Roberts brings a unique point of view to the network’s foreign assistance reform efforts.   Below, for the first time on the ModernizeAid blog, Roberts lays out the first in two parts on his conservationist’s argument for foreign assistance reform, which WWF first unveiled in its “Greenprint” for the Obama Administration in January 2009.

He’ll be taking his conservation and reform message to Capitol Hill tomorrow when he testifies about the Congo Basin Forest Partnership at a bi-cameral briefing for Congress hosted by the International Conservation Caucus (ICC).

A Green Foreign Policy

By Carter Roberts, President and CEO, World Wildlife Fund US

Three billion people face water insecurity. Tropical deforestation causes 20% of greenhouse gas emissions. One-third of arable land is abandoned due to soil erosion and 75% of the world’s marine fisheries are fully exploited. By the end of the century, we may lose 50% of all the plant and animal species on earth, many before we even discover them.  From an environmental perspective, we are coming dangerously close to the point of no return.

Developing countries are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate variability and environmental degradation.  Natural capital comprises about 25% of low income countries’ GDP. Moreover, poor rural communities in these same countries rely directly on natural resources for their livelihoods whereby an eroding natural resource base undermines their chances at escaping poverty. And now, the role the environment plays in global instability and conflict is becoming increasingly evident as witnessed by the imperative expressed by the Pentagon to plan now for international conflict and catastrophe born of climate change. We, too, in the U.S., are directly affected –by climatic extremes, disappearance of genetic plant material used to develop medicine, and a dwindling supply of fish. One way or another we pay.

Foreign aid is vital to reducing poverty, increasing our security, and preserving the future of our planet.  Yet most of our foreign assistance programs are ill-equipped to address these challenges at scale. Under the current foreign assistance structure, no overarching strategy is offered to the multiple, and at times competing, agencies expected to deliver U.S. assistance abroad. In this bureaucratic maze, USAID and other agencies lack the technical experts, funding, and long-term mandates necessary to build capacity within national governments, local institutions and civil society organizations and to ensure that environmental concerns are integrated into strategies and programs in all sectors. In order to affect meaningful and lasting results, both development and the environment should be elevated within foreign assistance and conservation should be fully incorporated into all relevant aid programs.

The Congo Basin Forest Partnership (CBFP) provides an example of how a U.S. foreign assistance program, starting with the environment and poverty reduction, can help achieve a broad array of foreign policy objectives. Launched in 2002, the CBFP brings donor agencies, international organizations, NGOs, scientific institutions, private sector, and local governments together to implement the Yaoundé Declaration, an agreement struck by the 10 Congo member states to promote conservation of the region’s forests.  Through this partnership, we are seeing real results in improving the livelihoods of the poor, conserving the environment, and resolving trans-boundary conflicts through structured diplomatic channels.

As a result, not only is 40% of the world’s second largest rainforest sustainably managed, but local livelihoods are enhanced, sustainable economic growth is possible, and global goods and services are protected. At the same time, in a region plagued by turbulent conflict and instability, the CBFP provides a forum for ongoing diplomatic engagement which helps to ease these tensions.

The Congo Basin is not an isolated case – there are many other countries and regions that desperately need this same kind of holistic approach to foreign assistance to reverse growing poverty and depletion of natural resources. Our approach includes country ownership, a strong civil society and harmonized donor funding. Our approach recognizes that through the environment we have an entry point to addressing many of central diplomatic, development, and security concerns.   Finally, our approach recognizes that the environment should stand as a central pillar of our foreign policy.