blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘Center for Global Development’

MFAN Named “Leading Coalition” by Foreign Affairs

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Foreign Affairs logo

As part of Foreign Affairs‘ featured Reading Lists, John Gershman rounds up a list of books, reports, journal publications, and websites for “What to Read on Foreign Aid. ”  Included in his list, Gershman cites MFAN as “the leading coalition of organizations in the United States working to reform U.S. foreign aid in line with a more strategic approach to development policy in general.”

A professor with New York University’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, Gershman’s list includes the Commitment to Development Index, put out by MFAN partner the Center for Global Development, The End of Poverty by Jeffrey Sachs, The Bottom Billion by Paul Collier, and “Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid,” by William Easterly and Tobias Pfutze.

Click here to read Gershman’s full syllabus for foreign aid.

Media Explores Roles of Civilian and Military Responders in Haiti Relief Efforts

Friday, January 22nd, 2010
Bookmark and Share

As the effort to provide aid to Haiti continues,  questions have emerged about whether the massive humanitarian response is being handled properly from a organizational perspective.  Should Dr. Rajiv Shah, the new USAID Administrator, and his civilian colleagues be coordinating the response?  Should the U.S. military lead the way?  Below is a sampling of opinion pieces and news stories on this issue:

  • U.S. Military Should Have Reached Haiti Sooner (CNN-Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, January 14) Regarding the airport, he said, “You need to put the right commander there who’s going to be a battle captain and keep those aircraft flowing. You come in, you drop off what you have, you put the sick and wounded on and then move out. No one is standing any time on the airfield. You can be in and out in a half hour.”
  • MFAN-related: Helping Haiti: Eight Key Points (Huffington Post-Anne Richard, January 19) American troops can protect a neighborhood or building, but aid agencies do a better job designing ways to protect women and young girls from predatory men after a crisis. Soldiers can quickly establish links to other militaries and peacekeepers, but diplomats and international relief experts are also needed. Aid agencies can work with communities and stay for the longer term. The U.S. military can fly in, set up and staff a brand new clinic while aid agencies can reinforce networks of existing clinics and help local staff. All of this is needed.
  • U.S. Military Plays High-Profile Role in Haiti Relief Effort (Newshour-Andrew Natsios & Lt. Gen. Jay Garner, January 19) [Natsios]: But the international disaster assistance system is not based on military leadership. It’s based on civilian leadership. It’s USAID, under federal law, that has that leadership role. But there are 60 of these disasters a year that AID responds to, and no one ever hears about them because they don’t get into the news. And they’re very effectively run. And most of them, the military doesn’t get involved.
  • MFAN-related: Haiti’s Tragedy and the Inevitable Controversy (Huffington Post-J. Brian Atwood, January 20) USAID has a large mission in Haiti and its personnel know the people and the structures of Haitian society. They can provide guidance and assure that our military will be seen as a benign force. In addition, organizations like CARE, Catholic Relief Services, Save the Children and UNICEF prefer to work under civilian not military direction.  The Haiti operation is an all-government response, but USAID/OFDA is appropriately in the lead. The President has designated Dr. Rajiv Shah, the USAID Administrator to coordinate the USG response and by all accounts he is doing an outstanding job.
  • White House Eager to Project Image of Competence in Relief Efforts (The New York Times, January 21) The White House has won praise for its Haiti relief efforts, which have included Mr. Obama’s pledge of $100 million in aid and the deployment of 10,000 troops to Haiti, and a promise of more. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton cut short a trip to the South Pacific and rushed home so she, too, could visit Haiti. “It’s important to give people a sense that you’re making progress,” he [John Simon] said

We encourage readers of the ModernizeAid blog to weigh in on this debate in the comments section below.

Best of 2009: MFAN in the News

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

As part of our “Best of 2009” series, below are of some of the greatest media hits from MFAN and its partners.  The past year saw unprecedented momentum for foreign assistance reform, and MFAN’s members offered keen insight into the nuances of the issue, successfully reaching out to a broad audience and strengthening the development voice in policy discussions.   Keeping development and reform in the news answers Secretary Clinton’s call to make the case to the American taxpayer and prove that development is a “strategic, economic, and moral imperative” tied to advancing American interests at home and abroad.

  • Ray-OffenheiserThe Advisors Obama Is Missing (ForeignPolicy.com-Ray Offenheiser, January) Despite his public commitments to elevate and strengthen U.S. global development efforts — those that alleviate poverty, fight disease, and create opportunity in developing nations while bolstering our security and prosperity at home — as a critical component of his foreign policy, he has yet to name even one senior official to be put in charge of bringing these critical changes to life.
  • Huffington PostThe U.S. Can (and Must) Do a Better Job Fighting Poverty, Disease, and Lack of Opportunity in the Developing World (Huffington Post-David Beckmann and Steve Radelet, March 17)  We support President Obama’s efforts to elevate development because the prosperity, health, and security of Americans are, now more than ever, inextricably linked to prosperity, health, and security of people in the developing world. We are urging foreign assistance reform because the economic and geopolitical realities of today, and the challenges of the future, demand that we use every dollar as effectively as possible to fight poverty and disease, increase prosperity, strengthen weak states, and further other U.S. strategic interests abroad.
  • lg_George-Ingram.jpgReorganization of USAID Is Focus of Senate Bill (CQ, July 29)  “There is clear, bipartisan momentum behind efforts to modernize the U.S. foreign assistance system to meet the diverse geopolitical and economic challenges we face,” George Ingram and David Beckmann, co-chairs of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, an umbrella group seeking a broad reorganization, said in a statement. “While there are many issues to be resolved, we are optimistic about success because both houses of Congress and the Obama Administration are making dynamic progress.”
  • Committees Plan to Take Foreign Assistance Back to the Drawing Board (CQ, August 3)  “Reducing duplication, mandating reporting and accountability, being able to track resource flows, reducing double counting — those are things that I would anticipate that the appropriators would embrace,” said Todd Shelton, senior director for public policy at InterAction, an umbrella group of aid organizations that contributed to the paper. But rewriting the Foreign Assistance Act is the most important step in an overhaul, said Sheila Herrling, senior policy associate at the Center for Global Development.
  • Washington Post logoLeadership Vacancy Raises Fears About USAID’s Future (The Washington Post, August 5) “Both President Obama and Secretary Clinton have said how important development is. Increasingly, it’s a painful contrast between their rhetoric and the reality of having no leadership” at USAID, said Carol Lancaster, interim dean of the Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, who served as deputy administrator of the aid agency under President Bill Clinton.  While development groups and experts have welcomed Obama’s boosting of the assistance budget, many are “very, very disappointed” with the lack of progress in reforming the aid system, said Brian Atwood, who headed USAID in the 1990s.
  • Ritu SharmaClinton Puts Spotlight On Women’s Issues (The Washington Post, August 18) Ritu Sharma, president of the anti-poverty group Women Thrive Worldwide, said she already sees the results of Clinton’s efforts in the bureaucracy. When Sharma’s staff recently attended a meeting about a new agricultural aid program, she said, one State Department official joked, “We have to integrate women — or we’re going to be fired.”  Still, Sharma questioned whether the program would succeed in reaching poor women, especially given the weaknesses in U.S. foreign assistance.
  • 20061031_markgreen_2Reform the right should embrace (The Washington Times-Mark Green, August 20) At a time when our national-security and foreign-policy priorities have become increasingly dependent on effective development, our political leaders must act swiftly and put partisan politics aside in order to enact reforms that will make our foreign-aid programs more efficient, more effective and therefore more capable of supporting and advancing our national interests around the globe.
  • NPR logoExperts Concerned by Leaderless USAID (NPR “All Things Considered”-Ray Offenheiser and J. Brian Atwood, August 27) Mr. OFFENHEISER: The State Department has advanced this quadrennial diplomacy and development review under Secretary Clinton that’s ambitious and potentially visionary, but there isn’t a development voice at the table presently, and that’s what we’re all concerned about.  Mr. ATWOOD: It’s a mess. It’s not fair to the taxpayer, but I think more importantly, it’s not fair to the poor of the world that we’re not doing our bit.
  • It’s Time for Foreign Aid Reform (Huffington Post-David Beckmann, August 27) The Obama administration has now made ambitious pledges to increase foreign assistance and modernize the system. This is largely because of an unprecedented consensus around the need to make development a pillar of U.S. foreign policy amid the complex and interconnected challenges we face.
  • Kerry and Lugar Push Obama on USAID (CQ, September 22) In an effort to expedite the process, the senators encouraged the president to appoint someone who has already been vetted by the Senate for another post or is well-known on Capitol Hill. Neither mentioned any names, but the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, a coalition of development advocates, has organized their own unofficial poll on who should lead the agency.
  • Associated Press logoEx-Gates Foundation exec named foreign aid chief (AP, November 10) Given that speculation, and the delay in appointing an administrator, David Beckmann, co-chair of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, said the administration needs to move quickly in defining Shah’s responsibilities.  “They’re going to need to give him some clear signals that he has real power,” he said.
  • David-Beckmann-photo-small-2Administration Names Agriculture Official to Run U.S. Aid Agency, Ending Delays (The New York Times, November 11) “This administration has inherited a very weak and fragmented Usaid and aid infrastructure,” said David Beckmann, the president of Bread for the World, a Christian group that advocates for hunger relief. “By getting someone in that position, Mrs. Clinton has taken a step forward.”  Mr. Beckmann called for Mr. Obama to restore the agency’s profile by giving Dr. Shah a seat on the National Security Council, and for Mrs. Clinton to give back its independent budget and policy-making authority, which had been subsumed by the State Department.
  • Politico logoShah meets with Kerry (Politico-Laura Rozen, November 19) ”The fact that we have a nominee with huge potential — finally — is a good thing,” O’Brien continued. “But he’s coming late to the conversation. And there’s a real question as to whether he is going to be given the face and authority going forward. The problem isn’t him. The problem is, is development going to be given a real seat at the table.”
  • Bill FristRaj Shah and America’s Development Future (Roll Call-Bill Frist, December 17) Dr. Shah has what is needed to carry on President Bush’s global health legacy and fulfill President Obama’s extraordinary development vision. The Senate should confirm him, and the Obama administration should give him the political support and resources he needs to succeed. Millions of lives will be affected by this choice.

Other notable stories from 2009 include: The Kojo Nnamdi Show with MFAN Principal Sheila Herrling, Center for Global Development, and member Paul O’Brien, Oxfam America; Huffington Post op-ed by MFAN Principal Noam Unger, Brookings Institute; USA Today with quotes by MFAN Principal Carol Lancaster,  Montara Center for International Studies, and member Paul O’Brien; All Africa op-ed by Ray Offenheiser, Oxfam America; Huffington Post op-ed by J. Brian Atwood, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; and Huffington Post op-ed by Ritu Sharma, Women Thrive Worldwide.

MFAN Statement: Secretary Clinton’s Development Vision Taking Shape at a Critical Time

Thursday, January 7th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

January 7, 2010 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

At yesterday’s speech hosted by the Center for Global Development, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton articulated a positive and transformative vision for the future of U.S. efforts to alleviate poverty, fight disease, create economic opportunity, and promote human rights in developing countries.  We strongly support the core of the Secretary’s vision: that development “is a strategic, economic, and moral imperative – as central to advancing American interests and solving global problems as diplomacy or defense.”

To answer Secretary Clinton’s call for a new mindset and a new approach, it is critical that we take – as she suggested – a whole-of-government approach to reforming the outdated structures and legislation that support U.S. development and foreign assistance efforts.  Reform will lay an effective and accountable foundation for reaching the goal the Secretary articulated: getting better development results for both recipients and U.S. taxpayers through: increased partnership by way of country-conceived plans; improved coordination in Washington and in the field; stronger measurement of development outcomes; and a renewed commitment to technology and innovation.

We look forward to working with Secretary Clinton, USAID Administrator Shah, other Obama Administration officials, and Congressional leaders to realize these goals – and the pledges made by President Obama during his campaign to revamp the U.S. approach to development and revitalize USAID – by building on the momentum for foreign assistance reform that was created in 2009.  As several important milestones approach, including the release of findings from the President Study Directive on Global Development Policy (PSD), the unveiling of interim recommendations from the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), and the introduction of a draft rewrite of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, MFAN is eager to work with the Executive and Legislative branches to ensure a more effective U.S. approach to global development.

For more information, contact Sam Hiersteiner at shiersteiner@gpgdc.com or visit www.modernizingforeignassistance.net.

Preview of Secretary Clinton’s Speech on Development Today

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Ahead of Secretary Clinton’s speech this afternoon hosted by the Center for Global Development, Director of Policy & Planning Anne-Marie Slaughter  and USAID Administrator Raj Shah briefed reporters on what to expect.  Key passages include:

Slaughter: “She will say in the speech development was once the province of humanitarians, charities, and governments looking to gain allies in global struggles. Today, it is a strategic, economic, and moral imperative as central to advancing American interests and solving global problems as diplomacy or defense.”

Slaughter: “So in that context where development is really a central part of our foreign policy, she is going to emphasize the need to ensure that all of our development activities are accountable, transparent, and results-oriented – that the measure for success is not how many dollars we spend or how many programs we fund, but results in terms of actual evidence of development, progress and health and education, economic growth more broadly, and the advancement of women.”

Shah: “The first is to pursue our work fundamentally in partnership, not patronage.  And the Secretary will speak more about this, but it is a real change in evolution where we will have very high expectations of political commitment and accountability for generating results in fields like agriculture and health and democracy…Second is around fundamentally elevating development to truly stand with diplomacy and defense as a major component of our foreign policy…A third is around coordination.  And we have – and the Secretary has used the phrase around a whole-of-government approach, bringing the best technical expertise from across the federal government to solve the problems that represent themselves as development challenges.”

Shah: “Another principle is around – is really around developing comprehensive strategies to create transformational change in a focused set of areas, areas like health and agriculture, security, education, energy, governance.  Our challenge will be in countries and in places where we work, really focusing on scale and transformative impact, and recognizing that if we try to do everything everywhere, we will likely be unable to have the kind of lasting impact that you can have when you focus our resources and focus our strategic thinking and approach a smaller set of challenges, but in a more comprehensive and strategically significant way…And the next principle is around investing and innovation…And finally, and perhaps most important, is the fundamental concept that I think Secretary Clinton represents to so many people around the world that women and girls are perhaps the most important area of focus for achieving sustainable development.”