blog logo image

Guest Post: Richard Morford on the MCC as a Model for Foreign Aid Reform

August 12th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

See the guest post below from Richard Morford, former Managing Director for Donor and Multilateral Relations at the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC).

What Foreign Aid Reform Can Learn from the Millennium Challenge Account

Richard A. Morford


The Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), the major experiment in reform of development assistance of the Bush Administration was designed to test whether bundling “lessons learned” over the past half century of foreign aid could yield greater development results.   It is still too early to do a full blown assessment of MCA performance and that of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) which administers the Account, but as the Obama administration and Congress undertake major reviews of foreign assistance, it makes sense to look at the experiences of this ongoing reform effort and see how they might inform the broader reviews currently underway.   Here are nine takeaways:

1.  Design for Purpose:  MCA was designed to help poor countries with relatively good political, economic and social policies “reduce poverty through growth”.  One of the strongest assets of MCC is that all staff members understand its mission.  Its objectives, governance and authorities were clearly spelled out in legislation to accomplish this quintessential development purpose.  There are many reasons why the USG provides foreign assistance beyond poverty reduction and development.  Humanitarian need, national security, and transnational threats are other compelling missions.  It is important to have clear mission statements for each.  Once the mission is clear, governance, authorities and modalities should differ based on how best to meet each purpose.

Read the rest of this entry »

CGD Defends Untied Aid

August 12th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

On Monday, MFAN member Sarah Jane Staats – director of policy outreach at the Center for Global Development – outlined three reasons why Senator Jim Webb’s (D-VA) calls for putting a stop to Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) funding to non-U.S. companies in Africa will not solve any of our economic or development problems.  Staats argues:

1. It’s bad development. Restricting overseas development contracts to domestic bidders – so-called “tied aid” – buys political support at home, but often costs more and is less effective.

2. Taxpayers pay more, but get less…Requiring the MCC to use only U.S. companies in regions where they could be more expensive, less effective, or may not exist, unduly constrains our aid dollars and ends up costing American taxpayers more money.

3. The MCC is not ExIm or OPIC. The U.S. Export-Import Bank (ExIm) and theOverseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) are designed specifically to help U.S. businesses invest overseas.

Staats reminds us that tying development assistance to U.S. companies is not only bad development, but it goes against the principle of ownership of aid that has popped up in the Obama Administration’s initiatives like Feed the Future and the Global Health Initiative.  Read the full piece here.

Watch Highlights from the MFAN-GHTC Event

August 10th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Last week, we gave a recap of our recent event with the Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) on leveraging innovative research for development.  Now, GHTC has posted a series of clips from the event on their YouTube channel.  See below for MFAN Principal and President and CEO of the Global Health Council Jeff Sturchio’s opening remarks, and watch the rest of the event by clicking here:

MFAN Member Staats on Vacancies at USAID

August 10th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Last week, MFAN Member Sarah Jane Staats, director of policy outreach at the Center for Global Development, published an op-ed  in the Global Post lamenting on the vacant leadership positions at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).  Staats argued that these top positions need to be filled in order for the agency to successfully implement internal reforms and move the overall foreign assistance reform agenda forward.  Staats wrote:

“To date, only one official — USAID Administrator Raj Shah — has been confirmed. While Shah has skilled and capable leaders in his front office and throughout the agency, several of whom have been doing yeoman’s work in acting positions, it is unconscionable that all remaining management seats remain unfilled 18 months into this administration. Shah cannot captain the USAID ship without a crew.”

“USAID cannot be the premier development agency everyone envisions without appointed and confirmed leaders at the helm of its regional and functional bureaus. Nor can it elevate development across the U.S. government — as Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and even Secretary of Defense Robert Gates have called for — without a full cadre of assistant administrators to inform major development policy reviews taking place right now and congressional efforts to rewrite foreign assistance legislation.”

Josh Rogin later reported on The Cable that President Obama intends to nominate Nancy Lindborg — current President of Mercy Corps and MFAN Principal — to be Assistant Administrator for USAID’s Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Affairs Bureau, as well as nominate Donald K. Steinberg to be Deputy Administrator of USAID.  The other names working their way through the nomination process are: Mark Feierstein to be Assistant Administrator of Latin America and Nisha Desai Biswal to be Assistant Administrator of Asia; both were approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week.  The Obama Administration is now batting 5 out of 12 for Senate-confirmed leadership positions at USAID.

MFAN Co-Chair Beckmann: “Rhetorical Rubber Meets the Road” on Aid Reform

August 6th, 2010
Bookmark and Share

MFAN Co-Chair David Beckmann, World Food Prize laureate and President of Bread for the World, has a new piece on foreign assistance reform, offering two steps President Obama should take now to put the U.S. on a path to more efficient, effective aid — the same two action steps listed in MFAN’s Open Letter, published yesterday.   The op-ed first appeared in The Huffington Post, but find full text of the piece after the jump:

Read the rest of this entry »